Does your offensive fit your personnel or does your personnel fit into your offense?
This is not exactly a unique thought. Do you use the same offensive system each season, or based on your personnel, you change your offense each season? There are so many ways to play the game. Do you go with a continuity style offense? Do you use motion offense? Do you run set plays only or add them as you go along. Like almost everything else in life, the answers are not all that easy. I have used a little bit of everything. Let me suggest some pros and cons to each.
1) Continuity Offense ..... When Bo Ryan was at Wisconsin the "Swing" offense
became popular. When Gary Williams was a Maryland he used the "Flex"
offense to great success. You can go online and find dvds on many
different continuity offenses. Most coaches like them, because they and
the players know, what they are suppose to do based on where the ball
goes. Control of the process is important. Some coaches believe
players need less freedom (options) to be efficient. Others find continuity
style offenses to be rather constraining. Players become too robotic and
opponents can easily scout them and disrupt them.
2) Motion Offense .... Dick and Tony Bennett have become popular for using
the "Blocker Mover" motion offense. Basically it involves two screeners
(blockers) and three cutters (movers). Popular because of role
assignments and when you have players who have fairly limited offensive
skills it can be very effective. There are many varieties of motion offense
with the 4 out 1 in being very popular today, but some also use 3 out 2 in
motion. Personally, I have always found teaching motion offense to be
challenging. I never could master the degree of patience necessary to find
sustained success. I like the idea of teaching players to "read" the defense,
and based on how your defender is playing you, adjust your movements.
I just found it difficult to teach. The unpredictability of the offense is a big
selling point for many coaches. Executed correctly it is very difficult to
scout and defend.
3) Set Plays .... For a number of
years, we ran a version of
the Kansas Hi-Lo Offense.
What offensive movements
we attempted to execute
were predicated on where
or how the offense was
initiated. We usually
started in a 3 out 2 in
alignment. The point guard
had six options: a) Entry
pass to either wing. b)
Entry pass to either post. c)
Dribble entry to either wing.
We then added additional
set plays as the season
progressed. The ideal set
play offense will have
elements of continuity built
in. At some point in time,
you will face an opponent
that will be coached well
enough to force you to run through your sets until you break down the defense. Unfortunately, the first time this may happen is at tournament time!
Obviously, this is an important decision and will reflect your coaching philosophy. I do believe strongly in this ..... YOU CAN'T TEACH WHAT YOU
DON'T KNOW! Don't pick an offense because last year's state champion runs it. Can YOU teach it? Does it fit your personnel? For example, do you
want to run a five out type offense when one or more of your players needs to play with their back to the basket to be effective?
Over many years of coaching I found the following to be true. If you ask your
team if they want to play uptempo and play fast, they always say yes UNTIL
they realize you have to run hard on every possession to get that style of play to be effective. THEY LIKE THE IDEA THEY JUST AREN'T CRAZY ABOUT THE REALITY!
Kommentare